He never gave birth

Were I to write a blog post claiming my dog had played Moonlight Sonata on my piano, you would know it was impossible and ridiculous.  Were I to claim that hot is cold, night is day, or black is white, you’d say I was crazy.  And yet CNN, a once reputable news organization, actually led a ludicrous story with the ludicrous headline:  “He gave birth. He breastfed. Now, he wants his son to see him as a man.”

Of course, nobody to whom the pronoun “he” applies is capable of giving birth or breastfeeding.  These bodily functions are limited only to the female sex, who are conveniently distinguished by the feminine pronoun “she.”  “He gave birth” is just as impossible as “hot is cold.”  Of course, this headline was meant to grab clicks because of its very impossibility.  But because the story is about a woman, CNN is openly lying by writing a headline referring to this gal as guy, and doing so persistently throughout the story.  CNN knows the story is about a woman, but is lying and calling her a “him”.

The woman in question now goes by the name “Sabastion” (sic), and CNN was kind enough to provide repugnant photos of this lady naked from the waist up, with grotesque scars on her chest where her breasts were removed.  The doctor who performed this mutilation should lose his medical license and spend at least 10 years in prison.

Meanwhile she met her husband, whom she calls her “wife”, at a transgender convention.  The so-called “wife” is actually a man, and is a morbidly obese trannie who is immediately identifiable as a man because, well, he’s a man.

The entire thing is a freak show that doesn’t deserve one drop of ink, but CNN, apparently desperate to stay relevant is all over it.

The entire thing is a tragedy.  Nobody in this sickening “family” is helped by the delusions perpetuated by the media or the so-called “doctors” who are working with them.  These are disturbed individuals, totally out of touch with reality, dragging a child into their insanity, which, like all insanity, will not end well.

Meanwhile shame on CNN and its so-called reporter, Kendall Trammell.  With all the hoopla about “fake news”, here is one article that is so blatantly a lie that it is totally indisputable.  Referring to a woman as a “dad” and claiming “He breastfed” is just flat out nonsense, and the fact that so many people accept it is proof positive of the cowardice of the American people.

Dr. Moynihan on Miss Davis

I know absolutely nothing about Robert Moynihan, PhD, but I can’t think of a better example of the problem I illustrated in my previous article on the plight of Miss Kim Davis.  Dr. Moynihan refers to the imprisonment of Miss Davis, who refused to issue gay “marriage” licenses, as unjust.  According to the law, “she must abandon her own deeply held belief…” (Emphasis mine.)  Miss Davis “has chosen to accept arrest and jail rather than abandon her belief.” (Emphasis again mine.)  Further:  “Kim is the first of many US citizens unwilling to abandon their principles before such an unjust law.” (You probably guessed who added the emphasis.  I presume Dr. Moynihan knows Miss Davis personally, given that he referred to her by her first name.)  One assumes Dr. Moynihan did not receive his doctorate in political science, as he also states the following:  “This case is the result of a wrong and unjust law passed on June 26 by the US Supreme Court.”

As to the latter quote, we all should know that the USSC does not, in fact, pass laws.  The job of the Court is the same as any judicial institution, namely, to apply the laws passed by the legislature (and approved by the executive) to specific cases.  It is not the primary job of the judiciary, by the way, to interpret laws.  This power is a necessary corollary of the power to apply laws to specific circumstances.

That being said, look at the former quotes.  Dr. Moynihan places the entire affair into the realm of the subjective.  Miss Davis shouldn’t be forced to abandon her beliefs;  Miss Davis has her principles.  She shouldn’t be forced, in other words, to violate her own conscience.  Well, who cares what her internal belief system is?  If individual conscience is king, why should Larry the homo county clerk be forced into providing a license to two Catholics?

More gems from the doctor:  “It is important to note that in this matter even some self-described homosexuals have said they oppose homosexual ‘marriage’…”  Why?  Because children have a “right” to a mother and a father.  Well, fine enough, but why on Earth should we care what a few sodomizers think?  What possible merit does their opinion have when considering the objective evil of sodomy?  Why would he even quote such people in an article which also cites St. Thomas Aquinas?

As I stated before, county clerks should not issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, not because it conflicts with their personal beliefs, but because it is objectively wrong.  Marriage is a reality in the objective order of things, and as such, has certain requirements.  One of them is that both parties be living.  Another is that the parties be of the opposite sex.  A clerk should not issue these licenses because it is impossible.  The second reason is that the USSC decision is invalid and illegal.

Those are the main reasons, but if you want, here’s a bonus:  Sodomy is a revolting, unnatural, and immoral practice which should be illegal.  At least one party to this act is a victim, and no clerk should be forced to commit people to this perversion.

We will never win this fight until we are clear about our terms.

Transgender health care rules

Remember how, whenever two sodomizers get “married,” we are asked why we should care about their private life?  “Why should you, oh Mr. Religious Conservative, care if Bob and Larry get married?  What’s it to you?”  Aside from the objectively nonsensical idea that members of the same sex can somehow be married (they can’t), remember that the marriage push is the tip of a much larger spear in the LGBT movement which is designed to force you, like it or not, to cooperate with their vice.

Case in point, President Obama has issued “rules” (we used to have laws) instructing the now-nationalized health care industry that they may no longer “discriminate” against “transgender people.”  This means, first of all, that your health insurer will have to start paying for care related to gender re-assignment.  They already pay for hormonal treatments, and while the new “rules” won’t force them to cover sex-reassignment surgery, you can be sure eventually they will.  What a disturbing world we live in that men are dosing themselves with female hormones and then going to a surgeon to have their manhood lopped off.  Actually, what a disturbing world that such self-trauma is covered by “insurance.”

Now keep in mind how insurance works.  If you are a healthy adult, you are paying into insurance that you are not actually using.  Your money goes into a pool that will help cover Christopher’s transition to Christine.  Congratulations, you are paying for this psychopathic mutilation.

The second part of the executive order states that health care facilities will no longer be allowed to bar gender-confused individuals from their “preferred” restroom.  So now, while your wife is using the hospital ladies’ room, she’s going to have to share it with poor old Chuck, a man in a dress who has a few issues with his, er, sexuality, and prefers the company of women whilst doing his business.  Good luck to you when you rush into the ladies’ room when you hear your wife scream, but at trial I recommend claiming your own gender-confusion.

Some schools (schools!) are dealing with this problem by creating gender-neutral restrooms.  This is a non-solution for two reasons:  first, builders create men’s rooms and women’s rooms because they can handle multiple men or women at a time.  It isn’t economical in most facilities to have a large number of single restrooms, and gender-neutral restrooms are that.  (Maybe we have men’s rooms, women’s rooms, and sex-pervert rooms?)  In the second place, the goal of the LGBT movement is to force you to participate in their destruction of objective reality.  It does them little good to have everyone off in their little cubicle when their real goal will be to force everyone into a single, large gender-indistinct room.

As I have said a number of times in the past, ultimately the philosophical absurdity of Nominalism is to blame for this, as well as its offshoot called Existentialism.  Nominalists don’t recognize the reality of essence, and so they think any class of things we recognize (e.g. men, women) are a class merely by name and not because they share any common essence.  This makes the individual the only truly real thing, and hence individual expression trumps any sort of group gender-identity.

This would be less harmful if it staying in the halls of what passes for academia these days, but the advocates of such views are not content with that.  And so, now you are paying for gender-benders to mutilate themselves and letting sex-perverts into your restrooms.

Here we go again…

It’s almost not worth repeating, but why not.  The same story we keep hearing over and over again, which, in fact, the media loves to report, because they are currently in the process of reshaping reality ever more having achieved their goal of sodomitical marriage.  The story?  Boy is born a boy.  Boy decides he is a girl.  Boy puts lipstick on and claims he is a girl.  Even though boy looks like a boy, and is a cheap imitation of a female, his counselors at school, the LGBT “community” and various others encourage him living in a state of dementia.  Others point out to boy, perhaps somewhat harshly, that he is, well, a boy, even if he puts lipstick on.  Boy kills self.

Which of course is the fault of bad, wicked, mean, bullying religious conservatives who won’t refer to the boy by his pronoun of choice.  Nowhere does it occur to them that this young man is being encouraged to live his life as something he is not, as a matter of objective, undeniable fact.  If you are a transgender male and are reading this, let me tell you what everyone else is afraid to:  you are not a girl and you will never, ever be a girl, no matter how a judge’s pen or surgeon’s scalpel might attempt to alter that basic fact.  Sorry.  Does it upset you that you were born into this world with a body you couldn’t choose?  Join the club.  I wish I didn’t have my heart problems.  But I do.

Imagine if I had a son who stank at basketball, but loved the sport and obsessively dreamed of being a professional player.  He is puny and uncoordinated.  But I don’t want to let him down, so I keep telling him “son, you’re the best basketball player there is!  Some day you will go pro!  Don’t let anyone else tell you otherwise, you’ll be in the NBA some day!”  Then, what do you think will happen when he gets cut from the team?  Wouldn’t I do him a better service by giving him a reality check early, instead of allowing him to persist in his delusion?

Look at the picture of this young man.  What a tragedy that a chorus of enablers aided and abetted him walking around looking so completely ridiculous.  They wanted him to die, because they wanted martyrs for their cause.  Remember, if you’re a parent, they’re after your children too.  Watch out.

Sorry Mr. Alesana, you’re not pulling it off.